<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Across the Pond: A Feminist Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Five women, two in the US and three in the UK, blogging from a feminist perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:50:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Daddy&#8217;s Little Girls by consciousnessrazor</title>
		<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/daddys-little-girls/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>consciousnessrazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/?p=1008#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I really have to disagree--at least as far as the critique of Castle goes (I&#039;m not familiar with the others).  Your critique seems to be based on assumptions that fit your theory rather than a theory that flows from the actual content of the show.

First of all, nobody&#039;s pretending there&#039;s anything &quot;enlightened&quot; about Richard Castle.  He&#039;s a goofy writer that nobody takes too seriously.    Det. Beckett is neither &quot;overtly mentored by&quot; nor is she &quot;consistently bested by&quot; her &quot;borderline-omnipotent male counter part.&quot;  She&#039;s constantly besting him and proving him wrong.  There may not be a mom at home, but there is a female authority figure--the grandmother.  Castle isn&#039;t just redeemed by showing his &quot;softer side&quot; as a father--through the series so far we&#039;ve seen him making different choices as a result of his relationship with his daughter, seeing women as human rather than sex objects once he makes the connection that these young women are no different than his own daughter.  I&#039;ve heard men in real life remark that they began to recognize their own sexist behavior once they had a daughter.  Where&#039;s the bad in that?

I was one of those girls who had a horrible mother who was not always in the picture, and a loving, nurturing, and extremely flawed father.  Part of the reason I&#039;m drawn to the show is the sweet father-daughter relationship!  I think it&#039;s a little overly simplistic and kind of twisted to reduce affectionate father-daughter relationships to a replacement of hetero marriages.

I also think it&#039;s great to see men in roles as loving, nurturing, affectionate fathers.  There are far too few of these around.  Liberating women involves liberating men as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really have to disagree&#8211;at least as far as the critique of Castle goes (I&#8217;m not familiar with the others).  Your critique seems to be based on assumptions that fit your theory rather than a theory that flows from the actual content of the show.</p>
<p>First of all, nobody&#8217;s pretending there&#8217;s anything &#8220;enlightened&#8221; about Richard Castle.  He&#8217;s a goofy writer that nobody takes too seriously.    Det. Beckett is neither &#8220;overtly mentored by&#8221; nor is she &#8220;consistently bested by&#8221; her &#8220;borderline-omnipotent male counter part.&#8221;  She&#8217;s constantly besting him and proving him wrong.  There may not be a mom at home, but there is a female authority figure&#8211;the grandmother.  Castle isn&#8217;t just redeemed by showing his &#8220;softer side&#8221; as a father&#8211;through the series so far we&#8217;ve seen him making different choices as a result of his relationship with his daughter, seeing women as human rather than sex objects once he makes the connection that these young women are no different than his own daughter.  I&#8217;ve heard men in real life remark that they began to recognize their own sexist behavior once they had a daughter.  Where&#8217;s the bad in that?</p>
<p>I was one of those girls who had a horrible mother who was not always in the picture, and a loving, nurturing, and extremely flawed father.  Part of the reason I&#8217;m drawn to the show is the sweet father-daughter relationship!  I think it&#8217;s a little overly simplistic and kind of twisted to reduce affectionate father-daughter relationships to a replacement of hetero marriages.</p>
<p>I also think it&#8217;s great to see men in roles as loving, nurturing, affectionate fathers.  There are far too few of these around.  Liberating women involves liberating men as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daddy&#8217;s Little Girls by kkhart0414</title>
		<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/daddys-little-girls/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>kkhart0414</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/?p=1008#comment-219</guid>
		<description>I have felt this way about my tween daughter&#039;s relationship with my ex-husband. I used to think I was alone with my feelings. Thank you for posting this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have felt this way about my tween daughter&#8217;s relationship with my ex-husband. I used to think I was alone with my feelings. Thank you for posting this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daddy&#8217;s Little Girls by Kimberly Springer</title>
		<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/daddys-little-girls/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Springer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/?p=1008#comment-218</guid>
		<description>@masculon&#039;s : it&#039;s important to keep in mind genre. why, for example, is the smart, attractive often bossy wife couple with the overweight, usually working class husband in comedy? sitcoms have a different purpose than dramas as jke is pointing out. just because an opposite stereotype exists in another genre doesn&#039;t make the point any less valid. 

@jke: anime eyes! now that&#039;s all i&#039;m going to see mooning at me. this is good context for my Veronica Mars viewing, but might be confounded by Californication. featuring another anime-eyed daughter, the producers have to keep the mom in the show since the dad&#039;s a sex addict and having solely him raising his daughter would invite the icks. 

do any of these shows attempt to have the smart, but not as intuitive woman mentor the daughter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@masculon&#8217;s : it&#8217;s important to keep in mind genre. why, for example, is the smart, attractive often bossy wife couple with the overweight, usually working class husband in comedy? sitcoms have a different purpose than dramas as jke is pointing out. just because an opposite stereotype exists in another genre doesn&#8217;t make the point any less valid. </p>
<p>@jke: anime eyes! now that&#8217;s all i&#8217;m going to see mooning at me. this is good context for my Veronica Mars viewing, but might be confounded by Californication. featuring another anime-eyed daughter, the producers have to keep the mom in the show since the dad&#8217;s a sex addict and having solely him raising his daughter would invite the icks. </p>
<p>do any of these shows attempt to have the smart, but not as intuitive woman mentor the daughter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daddy&#8217;s Little Girls by jke4</title>
		<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/daddys-little-girls/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>jke4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/?p=1008#comment-217</guid>
		<description>You just described what annoys me about Bones to a T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just described what annoys me about Bones to a T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daddy&#8217;s Little Girls by flyovermiss</title>
		<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/daddys-little-girls/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>flyovermiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/?p=1008#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, maybe Bones?  

Dr. Brennan (female) is presented as more intelligent than Agent Booth (male) in Bones, but her intelligence is limited strictly to matters of scientific inquiry; she&#039;s presented as tone-deaf to matters of emotion and interpersonal relations, in which Booth excels.  While the contributions of both characters are often required to solve the crime at issue, Brennan&#039;s insensitivity to emotional nuance leads her to appear almost as a precocious child who needs Booth&#039;s quasi-parental interpretation of adult emotions and relationships in order to function.  

So, no, maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, maybe Bones?  </p>
<p>Dr. Brennan (female) is presented as more intelligent than Agent Booth (male) in Bones, but her intelligence is limited strictly to matters of scientific inquiry; she&#8217;s presented as tone-deaf to matters of emotion and interpersonal relations, in which Booth excels.  While the contributions of both characters are often required to solve the crime at issue, Brennan&#8217;s insensitivity to emotional nuance leads her to appear almost as a precocious child who needs Booth&#8217;s quasi-parental interpretation of adult emotions and relationships in order to function.  </p>
<p>So, no, maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daddy&#8217;s Little Girls by jke4</title>
		<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/daddys-little-girls/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>jke4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/?p=1008#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Bummer re: Doctor Who.  I don&#039;t watch it (never watched the original, so I think the charm of the remake is lost on me) but sadly I&#039;m not surprised to hear it fits this model!  

I hadn&#039;t really thought about it specifically in terms of intelligence, more in terms of power, until I read your comment, and it&#039;s an interesting point.  I&#039;m trying to think of a show that&#039;s not a comedy where the woman is consistently presented as smarter than the male partner.  The Closer, I guess?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer re: Doctor Who.  I don&#8217;t watch it (never watched the original, so I think the charm of the remake is lost on me) but sadly I&#8217;m not surprised to hear it fits this model!  </p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t really thought about it specifically in terms of intelligence, more in terms of power, until I read your comment, and it&#8217;s an interesting point.  I&#8217;m trying to think of a show that&#8217;s not a comedy where the woman is consistently presented as smarter than the male partner.  The Closer, I guess?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daddy&#8217;s Little Girls by rosessupposes</title>
		<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/daddys-little-girls/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>rosessupposes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/?p=1008#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Doctor Who fits into the category of smart women being edged out quite a bit by a man (albeit an alien man--but we&#039;ve never seen a &quot;Time Lady&quot; to complement the &quot;Time Lords&quot;). I do enjoy the newest incarnation of the Doctor, but I could never understand why Billie Piper&#039;s character was the favored companion. Of any of the three recent ones, she seemed the least intelligent. Then Catherine Tate actually briefly became the Doctor, and it was brilliant to behold. But they solved that plot device by taking away her mind and memories. Terribly sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctor Who fits into the category of smart women being edged out quite a bit by a man (albeit an alien man&#8211;but we&#8217;ve never seen a &#8220;Time Lady&#8221; to complement the &#8220;Time Lords&#8221;). I do enjoy the newest incarnation of the Doctor, but I could never understand why Billie Piper&#8217;s character was the favored companion. Of any of the three recent ones, she seemed the least intelligent. Then Catherine Tate actually briefly became the Doctor, and it was brilliant to behold. But they solved that plot device by taking away her mind and memories. Terribly sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daddy&#8217;s Little Girls by jke4</title>
		<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/daddys-little-girls/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>jke4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/?p=1008#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Actually, I don&#039;t think a strong, attractive, intelligent wife married to a stupid fat obnoxious guy is any more of a feminist model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t think a strong, attractive, intelligent wife married to a stupid fat obnoxious guy is any more of a feminist model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daddy&#8217;s Little Girls by Masculon the Powerful</title>
		<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/daddys-little-girls/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Masculon the Powerful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/?p=1008#comment-212</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s an equal number of television shows that have a strong, attractive, intelligent wife and a stupid, fat husband. All television plays off stereotypes, either supporting them or contrasting them. It&#039;s the name of the game. Inevitably, some of the characters are going to be shown in a very bad light, some in a very good light. You can&#039;t make a show entirely out of positive role-models, it&#039;d be a snooze-fest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s an equal number of television shows that have a strong, attractive, intelligent wife and a stupid, fat husband. All television plays off stereotypes, either supporting them or contrasting them. It&#8217;s the name of the game. Inevitably, some of the characters are going to be shown in a very bad light, some in a very good light. You can&#8217;t make a show entirely out of positive role-models, it&#8217;d be a snooze-fest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Julie and Julia by htg03</title>
		<link>http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/julie-and-julia/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>htg03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femsacrossthepond.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/julie-and-julia/#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are right indeed about Ephron.  Though to read the reviews of the movie, you would think that Amy Adams made Julie into an annoying, whiny moron, not Ephron, so I felt compelled to make the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are right indeed about Ephron.  Though to read the reviews of the movie, you would think that Amy Adams made Julie into an annoying, whiny moron, not Ephron, so I felt compelled to make the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
